AMD FX 9370

Faber

Buono

Recensito in Italia il 1 maggio 2021

Il processore va una meraviglia solo non si riesce a tenere a bada nemmeno con un raffreddamento a liquido. Passa dai 40 gradi agli 84/87 in un batter d occhio. Ho dovuto fare un underclock per controllarlo.

Recensito in Italia il 10 gennaio 2014

Il processore si comporta bene con una scheda video radeon r9 290, ma cambiate la foto del prodotto dato che non e' la black edition con dissipatore, ma solamente la normale, con solamente il processore, a causa di questo dovro' fare un'altra spesa, e cio' non e' di mio gradimento

6 persone l'hanno trovato utile

Paolo Renzetti

Una piccola stufa!!

Recensito in Italia il 2 gennaio 2014

Scalda un po' troppo arriva a 90 gradi full, le temperature in idle sono contenute max 40 gradi, in ogni caso cpu molto veloce!!

Una persona l'ha trovato utile

tally

AMD FX 9370

Recensito in Italia il 23 dicembre 2014

provengo da fx 8150 con la valutazione ardware di microsoft 7,6 la fx 9370 7,8 quindi poca differenza, la prima 125 watt l'altra 220watt con incremento di calore e consumo.

2 persone l'hanno trovato utile

yasser

scalda tanto

Recensito in Italia il 18 giugno 2014

compratelo solo se avete un sistema di raffreddamento adeguato una schedamadre compatibile con amd fx series e un case ventelato , io uso noctua nh-d14 massima temperatora raggionta 63c , asus sabertooth fx 990 r2.0 e aerocool strike x

5 persone l'hanno trovato utile

Traduci tutte le recensioni in Italiano

Le recensioni migliori da altri paesi

Micro's Blues

Produit impeccable

Recensito in Francia il 21 agosto 2023

Vendeur au TOP !

eXaviar

TOP. Leistet sogar mehr!

Recensito in Germania il 2 marzo 2018

Habe mich an Anfang etwas geärgert, ABER OHNE Grund: Ich hatte gesehen, dass ich für ein paar Euros weniger auch einen mit 4,7GHz bekommen könnte. Dafür hätte ich den aber wieder zurück schicken müssen. GLÜCKLICHERWEISE schafft diese CPU von Haus aus auch 4,7GHz OHNE das ich irgendwann übertaktet habe. Einfach nur eingebaut, Paste und Kühler drauf und hochfahren. Bei der Kontrolle über CPUID HWMonitor sah ich dann, dass die CPU auf max 4721MHz hoch geht. Also alles gut. Gehäuse zumachen und glücklich sein.

Einen Unterscheid zu meinem alten 3,8Ghz Quad-Core ist DEFINITIV zu spüren! Ich bearbeitet größtenteils Fotos und da kam die alte CPU vor allem bei der 1:1 Vorschau und panning extrem ins Stottern. Jetzt läuft es flüssig! Herrlich! :D

4 persone l'hanno trovato utile

ヤフコメン民

さすが

Recensito in Giappone il 16 settembre 2017

中古で安くてにはいりました。さすが、王手出品者。
ともかく熱量が半端でないから、空冷式の場合は12cm三連ファンが必須、水冷式でも、ひとつのファンでは無理。

uber1337h4xx0r

Very fast processor compared to my previous one (although there is a possibility that it causes crashes when being run at max)

Recensito negli Stati Uniti il 5 settembre 2016

I upgraded from a 9 year old Q6600 so I might be a little biased since obviously a cpu that is almost (over?) a decade old is going to be defeated by a mainstream CPU that is like a couple of years old at most (actually, went back and checked - this came out in 2013, so it's about 2-3 years old at time of review). Not to mention that the computer I built with this had literally everything but my power supply upgraded with respect to my previous build. But either way, the new computer is obscenely faster and my benchmarks show that I'm getting over a 50% increase in score. At the time of building, I was highly considering getting an i7 processor, but I decided that I was not in a financial position to spend $400 on just a processor. I considered the i5 next, but even that was like $300 and I didn't want to have a 'compensating' CPU so to speak, knowing that there was a stronger chip in the same family.

So I decided I'd break my 20 year streak of using Intel CPUs (intel 486dx -> intel pentium 1 mmx -> intel pentium pro -> intel celeron -> intel (better) celeron -> intel q6600 -> AMD fx 9370 [not to mention my laptops, which were a celeron -> "pentium dual core" -> intel i7 mobile]) and went with the most powerful AMD chip I could find for under $200.

It definitely gets the job. I have been playing 3D (as in First Person Shooter 3d, not Virtual Reality) on Ultra High Settings for virtually every game I got my hands on, and it runs them between 45 and 60 FPS. Sometimes my numbers show me that it is running them at like 70 FPS, but my monitor only handles up to 60, so I intentionally cap it at 60 when that happens. Overwatch runs at around 48 on average on the highest settings. A friend told me about a Russian game (I think it's called Under the Metro?) and he said that would be the best indicator of how much my computer can handle; I got 45 FPS during busy parts of the game; roughly 55 in slower parts that didn't have too much going on.

An important thing I need to point out that I think is the fault of my processor, since I swapped out my video card, RAM, and formatted my harddrive (and tried two different OSes) and still got - Overwatch kept crashing my computer for a few days during a period of like four days. Like... it would run just fine for a while, but after a few games, my computer would suddenly freeze with no sound, and I couldn't move my mouse or anything. So I'd reset my computer, and be met with one of those "your computer crashed" messages. Sometimes instead of freezing, it'd blue screen and either do the classic IRQ less than or equal to error, or sometimes tell me I had a Kernel Panic or a corrupt Kernel or other similar issues. At first I thought it was my wireless programmable mouse. Some of the messages implied my keyboard or mouse was the cause. So I swapped both my keyboard and mouse with replacements temporarily - and the issue still occurred. I got desperate to the point that I was considering returning all the parts I'd bought since I couldn't narrow it down - and assumed the likely culprit was either my motherboard or CPU, which I wouldn't be able to isolate without buying a second CPU or motherboard.

However, I decided that since Amazon would likely want to ban me for doing about a $1000 return suddenly, that I should probably try to keep working on narrowing down the problem to a specific part... without having to order a new motherboard or CPU for testing (since I'd inevitably have to return two items either way - since I'd either find what the problem was and return the defective part and either the new motherboard or CPU, or I wouldn't find the issue and have to return two perfectly good pieces of hardware). So I kept researching and experiment.

At one point I decided maybe it was a heat issue, so I kept an eye out on my temperatures... they were relatively high, sure, but not enough to freeze my computer. Finally, that made me have an idea - what if I reduced my computer's power consumption in the BIOS? Maybe a chip or two were overheating that didn't have temperature settings? Maybe the CPU was reporting incorrect information to my temperature monitors?

So I went from "high performance" to "power saver". Ran Overwatch just fine for one night's gaming session, albeit noticeably slower (and I had to reduce my graphics settings). The next day decided to upgrade to "balanced mode". Game ran a lot faster, but still no crashes. Put it in high performance mode, and I believe within an hour, the crashes began coming back continuously.

I set it back to balanced and I haven't had a crash in like two months. Since I believe balanced mode also affects how fast your CPU runs, I believe this is an issue with this CPU. So if you are planning on running the CPU at its max potential, be warned that it is ***possible*** that it is the cause of the overwatch crashes that I was getting. You'll have to tune it back a bit. This seems to fall in line with the people that are saying that if you plan on overclocking this CPU that you run it with liquid cooling (I don't overclock, but I am using a Coolermaster V8 GTS giant fan that offers reasonable cooling, but nowhere near liquid cooling levels). I suppose that eventually, when I can afford liquid cooling, I'll try High Performance mode in my bios, but for now I'll stick with Balanced mode - I still do a lot of gaming at acceptable levels with no crashing.

And to reiterate - I can't guarantee this is a fault with the CPU; there's still a chance that the motherboard is at fault. I'm actually highly considering putting the computer in max performance mode just to confirm whether that setting is what caused the issues... since I haven't had the issues in months, if I test it now and get it, I'll know for sure it has to do with that mode. I'll try to provide updated info if I remember (and if I get around to actually testing it).

Also, another thing to keep in mind - I looked at some benchmarks just now, and it seems like some of the Core i5 intel CPUs outperform the strongest AMD CPUs significantly. If you can afford the higher cost of Intel CPUs (and their associated motherboards), then by all means get one of those instead. The only time you should get an AMD is if you're trying to get by with a relatively low budget and are looking to focus more of your money on the GPU and SSD.

4 persone l'hanno trovato utile

levesque

Five Stars

Recensito in Canada il 11 febbraio 2016

excellent produit je le recommande a tous