We have a couple of other projectors, the BenQ W1070 and the Aaxa ST200 ultra short throw portable. The Fugetek picture is adequate for movie viewing. Although it doesn't approach the quality, color, or resolution of the BenQ W1070 it is also about $500 cheaper. If I didn't have the two projectors in adjacent rooms where I can look through the doorway and compare the Fugetek and BenQ I would be hard-pressed to honestly notice any significant difference. However, for viewing computer input such as web browser with numerous tabs, spreadsheets, and other fine text and graphics the Fugetek is less clear, more difficult to read, and when it's keystoned you may as well forget it.I am including images to show the blur incurred by keystoning. The image is about 80" to 90" wide in the photos. The display is being projected onto my heavily textured off white wall in a mostly dark room. For proportions a 55" TV is the dark square to the left of the image and the 4" x 4" ceiling beams are visible at the top of the image. I was using my android phone to take the photo and picture quality is somewhat impaired by the long shutter time required for the dark room and the fact I probably moved a bit. The image that was not keystoned was quite clear and crisp in all regards. I am including closeups of the text on the left bottom of the screen so you can more easily compare the two. In real life there is a noticeable difference.I have limited wall space for the Fugetek at the moment, so it is set for about an 80" display. However, I tried it back further, providing about 120" to 140" of display and it looked clear and sharp either size (so long as no keystoning is applied).In contrast with the BenQ and Aaxa the sound the Fugetek puts out is surprisingly loud. I keep having to ask the kids to turn it down and I am a room away. I did not expect that. I have to use external speakers with my other projectors. Admittedly, the Fugetek is not going to please sound enthusiasts and better external speakers would be beneficial, but you don't absolutely need them with the Fugetek.We have this set up in our living room and even with three 40 watt LED bulbs blaring from our ceiling fan halfway between the projector area and the wall it was still possible to see the screen and everything on it. I was expecting even a small amount of light to completely blow the display out (this happens with the far fewer lumens on our Aaxa). I won't lie and tell you it looked great, the colors were badly washed out, but everything was still discernible and I could watch TV or a movie that way. This was a very nice surprise.My main gripe is that keystoning the Fugetek causes text to increasingly blur toward the edges. I get the same thing with the Aaxa. The Aaxa is very small, portable, and has a built-in battery, so I accept its keystone issues and the Fugetek is such a bargain that I feel it is an acceptable trade-off. As a consequence of the inability to use keystone in what I consider a normal way, without blurring everything outside center screen, the Fugetek requires you mount it at whatever height is required to project the image straight on without benefit of any keystone adjustment. This virtually eliminated mounting it on the ceiling for my application. But, again, this item is $170 dollars and I'm mainly getting it for my teens to use instead of my beloved BenQ. I extended the riser feet all the way, placed it on top of an upside down drink tray on an ottoman, placed a 2"x3" under the riser feet, gave up on keystoning, and pointed it at the wall. It may not display a square shape, but at least nothing is out of focus and it is still very much usable. Family members watched several movies, played some PS4 zombie killing game, used a computer and watched some youtube without any complaints.The focus adjustment is a little rough and tetchy, but keep fiddling and you'll get it close to right eventually.Size wise this projector is bizarrely large, but, in its defense, it is surprisingly lightweight relative to its size. Really had me scratching my head. Perhaps the manufacturer wants to give the appearance of substance? I would have really appreciated a smaller housing, if possible.We live where we regularly get magnitude 6 and up quakes and are frequently forced onto generator because of storm-related power outages, so I have been in the process of replacing large TVs that pose breakage hazards and that gobble wattage with safer, more economical LED projectors. Buying an 80" TV is prohibitively expensive and, at best, unwieldy, if not downright dangerous in these parts. This projector is adequate and inexpensive.If you've read this far I'd like to reiterate that this is not in the same league as the higher end BenQs or Optomas. If you'll only be buying one main projector, intend to watch it a lot, want viable mounting and placement options, and the extra $400 or $500 is something you can swing even if you have to save for a month or few more then you should do it right the first time.Considering the performance, the number of features available on this projector, and its price, currently $170, I think it's quite a bargain.