Do the words meta, post-modern, or experimental make you cringe when used to describe books? Then turn back now. I feel the need to say that up front because many people seem to go into this book expecting a horror novel and wind up wasting their money. Just take a look at the genres that goodreads lists this as. Horror, fiction, fantasy, and mystery. With inapt labels like that, it's easy to see how people could get the wrong idea.
This is not a horror novel, nor is it a mystery novel or a fantasy novel. This book is, among many other things, a personal story about the author's parents presented as experimental literary fiction that's thinly veiled as a horror novel. Confused? Good, stay that way for now, and don't think too hard about what I just said. I'm not that into horror novels, and I generally like post-modern and experimental stuff, and I knew what I was getting into when I bought this. Know what you're getting into, that's all I'm trying to say.
Here's the basic concept as clear and concise as I can tell it. There are essentially three narrators that will be addressing you, the reader.
1) Zampano, an old blind man
2) Johnny Truant, a thirty-something druggie
3) The "editors"
Johnny's friend, Lude, knows Zampano because he lives in the same apartment building. The old man, ominously, tells Lude he's going to die soon, and does. After the body is gone, Lude and Johnny sneak into the apartment to take a look around at Zampano's things. They find a crazy manuscript, which Johnny takes home with him.
The manuscript is a non-fiction book/dissertation about a documentary called "The Navidson Record." The Navidson Record is about a famous photojournalist named Will Navidson and his family moving into a new house that is bigger on the inside. When I say non-fiction, I mean it. It reads like a textbook. On every page there are footnotes about other articles and other books that reference this documentary that, by all accounts, doesn't exist (I'll get to this in a second).
It starts out simple at first. After the family returns home from vacation they notice a hallway on the second floor connecting two bedrooms that wasn't there before. They track down a blueprint of the building and see that there is a space between the walls, although it's not supposed to be a finished hallway with doors. Okay, no big deal, maybe they didn't notice the doors before, it's a new house after all and they had just moved in before going on vacation. Then comes the realization that measuring the house through that hallway results in an extra inch that shouldn't exist, and that can't be explained. Then a new door appears, on the first floor this time, that should lead to an empty back yard but instead leads to a long, dark hallway that extends into an endless labyrinth of cavernous, thousand-foot rooms that leads to god knows where and contains god knows what, and the exploration of this door is the main focus of the documentary.
So Johnny finds this manuscript, reads it, edits it, adds his own footnotes relating to research he's done on Zampano's life and the manuscript contents (translations of foreign phrases, for instance), but also personal tangents about his own life and stream of consciousness ramblings. In the prologue where he explains how he found the manuscript, he also says that The Navidson Record doesn't actually exist. Johnny's editors also appear in footnotes and in the first say they have never met Johnny Truant in person, only communicating via letters and rare phone calls. Weird, right?
What follows is 528 pages of an interwoven, multi-layered story. On the one hand, you have Zampano's non-fiction book about this fictitious documentary, which simmers as a slow-paced "found-footage" horror novel that can be unsettling, thought-provoking, but is likely to disappoint hardcore horror fans looking for adrenaline-pumping scares.
Then you have Johnny's story, told through long footnotes, which is more vague and slow to reveal itself, but the basic idea is that although he knows the manuscript is fiction, the act of reading it causes him to lose his marbles. Whether the manuscript or Johnny's brain chemistry is to blame is up to the reader. Whether Johnny is even telling the truth is up to the reader. And, to be honest, Johnny's parts can sometimes be hard to read because he's just pitiable and depressing and the stream of consciousness prose can wear down your focus. It gets Joyce-esque at times, though only for short stretches, because Danielewski is a nice man who wants you to have a good time, unlike Joyce, who hates you and hates fun. Then the "story" part ends, and you have 130 pages of appendices (which you should read) which include things like:
Zampano's writings which are not a part of The Navidson Record
The obituary of Johnny's dad
Childhood letters from Johnny's crazy, institutionalized, long dead mother
Poems
So what does it all mean?
Well, it means a clever and perhaps over-educated man named Mark Danielewski decided to write a novel that experiments with the format of the novel, that pushes the boundaries of what a novel can be and what it can do. While much of it could quite fairly be called a gimmick, and it won't be redefining how all novels are written going forward, it's a gimmick that works, that is unique, that is stimulating, that is discussion-worthy, that makes the world more interesting by existing, and isn't that what good art is supposed to do? It is an unmitigated success at being singular, and because it is singular it will inspire intense love and intense hatred from different people.
It means that while there are answers, you will have to work for them. I mean this both figuratively and literally. On the literal side, there is a letter in the appendices that is written in a simple code, which you will have to translate into a coherent message with pen and paper. And that's a code that is plainly said to be a code. There are other codes that are truly hidden.
Many sections have weird, cluttered layouts that make the act of reading them hard, and make tracking down the right footnote a scavenger hunt. You'll be presented with footnotes that make no sense until you realize the text is broken up over several pages and presented backwards. There are a lot of elements to the story, little throwaway lines and facts that you need to remember, or write down. How did Johnny's dad die. How did Navidson's dad die. Stuff like that. While it's not absolutely necessary, I'd recommend having a notebook handy starting on page one. I have an amazing memory, took notes here and there, and still wish I'd taken more. Like I said, this book is work. It's fun work though, depending on your tastes and personality. I'm an INTP and I loved it. Your mileage may vary.
On the figurative side, the book still won't hold your hand and spell out what it all means in flashing neon. That's up to you to figure out by gathering all the evidence together and deconstructing the book on several different levels by asking yourself what's true and what isn't, what matters and what doesn't, what's literal and what's figurative, what's the metanarrative, what's the subtext. Ultimately it's up to you to decide when you're satisfied with your answer.
While this is nowhere near as open to interpretation as most books you'd label as post-modern or modernist, it is still open to interpretation compared to a typical novel, which isn't open to interpretation at all. There are no easy answers, no definitive answers, but there are satisfying answers that I firmly believe are more or less what the author intended, if you're willing to put in the effort to discover them and have a flexible mind that delights in abstract concepts. Alternatively there are, of course, existing breakdowns of it on the internet that you can turn to for some help, although none I've read have gone far enough into speculation. They present facts and evidence, point out what's true or not, but none of them have drawn the kind of final conclusion that I've drawn. That's how it should be. You should decide for yourself. If none of this sounds like fun to you, I recommend giving this one a pass
Enjoy fast, free delivery, exclusive deals, and award-winning movies & TV shows with Prime
Try Prime
and start saving today with fast, free delivery
Loading your book clubs
There was a problem loading your book clubs. Please try again.
Not in a club? Learn more
Join or create book clubs
Choose books together
Track your books
Bring your club to Amazon Book Clubs, start a new book club and invite your friends to join, or find a club that’s right for you for free.
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Frequently bought together
$18.09
Get it as soon as Saturday, Mar 23
In Stock
Total price:
To see our price, add these items to your cart.
Choose items to buy together.
Similar items that may deliver to you quickly
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
From the Publisher
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Videos
Page 1 of 1Start OverPage 1 of 1
Videos for this product
1:50
Click to play video
Love having this in our collection! Here is why.
Heidi Leatherby
Videos for this product
0:21
Click to play video
Customer Review: A little disapointed
Amazon Customer
Videos for this product
0:34
Click to play video
House Of Leaves Book Review Full Color Remastered
✅️ Tom Bryan ✅️
About the author
Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.
Reviews with images
Visual storytelling at it's peak
I would like to preface this by saying that I've yet to properly read the book, I've only looked at some of the more interesting looking pages, and I'm about halfway through the introduction.That being said, this is the most interesting book i have ever had the pleasure of owning, the formatting of the text helps to demonstrate the visuals of what's going on.I didn't even have to read the whole book to understand some of the parts that I was looking at (I do plan on at least attempting to read this properly at some point)Although I wouldn't recommend this book for a casual reader, there's quite a few footnotes and for good reason. The author has used quite a few quotes in a verity of languages. And you are going to need to turn the book around quite a bit with all the interesting page layouts. Anyways,SPOILERS I guess:There's a series of pages where the words are confined to a small square as it describes a man who I assume is the mc crawling through a shrinking corridorAnd the space for the words gets smaller and letters get cut off and put on the next page,You can actually see what's happening with the formatting of the text as the corridor shrinks so does the amount of text on the page. it makes it easier for someone like me, who has a hard time visualizing things I read, to get that mental image of a Clostrophobic hallway slowly closing in.Towards the end there's a series of letters from a mother to her son, (I didn't read all of them, again VISUALLY interesting) and when she loses contact with him for no apparent reason she starts to lose her mind. The first thing i noticed when skiming over the letters in order is that she starts by signing the letters as mommy, and slowly the sign off becomes more and more detached. The words in the letters themselves end up written sideways or upside-down as she continues on. Eventually she starts layering the text as she gets desperate to hear from her son.
Top reviews from other countries
Edição primorosa com história incrível
Reviewed in Brazil on February 24, 2024
Reviewed in Brazil on February 24, 2024
São 3 camadas/histórias acontecendo simultaneamente com diferentes níveis de sanidade. A mais profunda delas é de uma família que, ao se mudar para uma nova casa, encontra nela algumas distorções proporcionais absurdas, como um corredor super longo e escuro (que demora 5/1½ para se percorrer inteiro) em uma parede que, externamente, seria impossível sua existência. Essa família, então, cria uma espécie de documentário que teoricamente nunca foi publicado através de gravações.
A segunda camada é o de um senhor cego que supostamente encontra essas fitas com as gravações, as assite e passa a escrever um documento manuscrito formatado como trabalho acadêmico analisando o suposto documentário.
Por fim, a camada mais superficial é a de um tatuador que encontra o documento do senhor, que recentemente faleceu e passa a cumprir o último desejo do falecido: publicar o manuscrito como livro (que no caso é o livro que o leitor tem em mãos). No meio desse compilado dos manuscritos, esse último personagem passa a escrever, com uma máquina de escrever, comentários e fatos sobre a vida dele, isso contribui para o livro apresentar centenas de notas de rodapé.
Tá, mas o que tem de diferente nisso tudo? As três camadas principais (existem mais) ocorrem SIMULTANEAMENTE na MESMA página e devem serem lidas JUNTAS. Conforme o livro passa, a história vai ficando cada vez mais maluca tanto de enredo, quanto de diagramação (que de normal passa a apresentar elementos gráficos diversos) e o mais interessante nisso é que aquela insanidade do senhor começa a passar para a história em si e também ao próprio leitor. Tem páginas com texto em formato de espiral, textos invertidos que devem serem lidos usando um espelho, cartas de uma mulher no manicômio que ao ser aplicado um "código" de descriptografia mostra uma mensagem super perturbadora de como ela está sendo tratada nesse manicômio e por aí vai. Páginas com apenas uma palavra. Páginas com textos espalhados nas margens e um quadrado preto gigante no meio. Isso é só o começo e o melhor de tudo, faz muito sentido com o que está acontecendo na história.
Foi uma leitura SENSACIONAL e arrepiante com momentos inclusive de romance, mas sobretudo com predomínio do medo do desconhecido de tla forma que sua própria casa, antes um local de conforto e lazer, acaba ela própria se tornando um local dúbio a seus olhos, como leitor.
- Em relação a edição:
Adquiri uma edição denominada como "Encadernação Clássica" que nada mais é que a edição bruchura/paperback encadernada em capa dura/hardback pela empresa "TurtleBack Books" que prepara livros para bibliotecas a fim de que os mesmos durem mais tempo e tornem-se mais resistentes.
Images in this review
Zackiepie
THE HOUSE IS ALL IN THE HOUSE IS ALL IN THE HOUSE IS ALL IN THE HOUSE IS all in the house of leaves
Reviewed in Germany on March 4, 2024