Buy used:
$15.30
Get Fast, Free Shipping with Amazon Prime
FREE delivery Monday, May 20 on orders shipped by Amazon over $35
Condition: Used: Good
Comment: This is a used book is in good condition. It may contain minor marks, cuts, and/or bends. All pages, covers, and dust jackets are intact. Access codes, CDs, and other bundled media may not be present or usable. 100% money-back guarantee on all orders.
Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items.
Kindle app logo image

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

QR code to download the Kindle App

Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.

Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy Paperback – August 15, 1974

4.6 4.6 out of 5 stars 100 ratings

In this work the distinguished physical chemist and philosopher, Michael Polanyi, demonstrates that the scientist's personal participation in his knowledge, in both its discovery and its validation, is an indispensable part of science itself. Even in the exact sciences, "knowing" is an art, of which the skill of the knower, guided by his personal commitment and his passionate sense of increasing contact with reality, is a logically necessary part. In the biological and social sciences this becomes even more evident.

The tendency to make knowledge impersonal in our culture has split fact from value, science from humanity. Polanyi wishes to substitute for the objective, impersonal ideal of scientific detachment an alternative ideal which gives attention to the personal involvement of the knower in all acts of understanding. His book should help to restore science to its rightful place in an integrated culture, as part of the whole person's continuing endeavor to make sense of the totality of his experience. In honor of this work and his The Study of Man Polanyi was presented with the Lecomte de Noüy Award for 1959.

Read more Read less

The Amazon Book Review
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.

Product details

  • Publisher ‏ : ‎ University of Chicago Press; First Edition (August 15, 1974)
  • Language ‏ : ‎ English
  • Paperback ‏ : ‎ 428 pages
  • ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 0226672883
  • ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-0226672885
  • Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 1.15 pounds
  • Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 5.75 x 1 x 8.75 inches
  • Customer Reviews:
    4.6 4.6 out of 5 stars 100 ratings

About the author

Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.
Michael Polanyi
Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.
Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more

Customer reviews

4.6 out of 5 stars
4.6 out of 5
100 global ratings
The Simply Impossible Position of Scientific “Objective” Knowledge
5 Stars
The Simply Impossible Position of Scientific “Objective” Knowledge
Polanyi has written a extraordinarily important epistemological study which overturns many present day thinkers parochial, arrogant pointless views. A genuinely fresh air of sane thinking. A student of philosophy
Thank you for your feedback
Sorry, there was an error
Sorry we couldn't load the review

Top reviews from the United States

Reviewed in the United States on March 14, 2013
I have some words of advice for a new reader of Michael Polanyi's Personal Knowledge. These tips will likely apply more or less to the extent by which the reader studies philosophy, but either way, they are useful considerations. For starters, a beginner should be okay with only a loose understanding of Polanyi's content (if any grasp at all) at any given time. The breadth of covered ground within this text spans wider than the average mind, and you cannot be expected to consistently maintain an even moderate comprehension. However, proceed steadily; keep faith in Polanyi's control, and expect with good nerve moments of clarity.

Secondly, after reading any given section, be it one page long or twenty, write down a couple sentences of takeaway knowledge. Obviously, you can look to Polanyi's italicized sentences for guidance towards the most noteworthy ideas. But search particularly for those keywords that strike you in ways you might not expect. Find the dictional centres around which the rest of the words revolve. In this way you will set yourself up for a third instruction: you are learning a new language.

Consider reading Personal Knowledge less like a philosophy lecture and more like a storybook in a foreign language. Truly, the text demands immersion into the title itself, this new and unassuming paradox coined by Polanyi--this "personal knowledge"--and immersion into all the unexpected stories of which the author draws upon to make his point. Albeit, the logical flow of Polanyi's argument is not contingent upon all of these pieces. Polanyi himself acknowledges time and time again how many parts are "digressions," "beside the point," or "merely interesting." After struggling through chapter five, you may admittedly feel betrayed by the beginning of six: "the previous chapter was a digression" (132). (Not to tempt you with skipping chapter five--don't). I would go so far as to say that, from the standpoint of logician's progress, four-fifths of the text is non-essential material.

That being said, the four-fifths may actually be quite essential in the sense of immersion. Within the four-fifths are surprising stories of all kinds: speech and mathematics, evolution and biology, crystallography and communications and probability, reason, faith, doubt, God, etc. Each of the different narratives pushes and prods our understanding of personal knowledge, and not just that, each narrative expands the meanings of a whole arsenal of words employed by Polanyi to make his point. Of course, describing this expansion is difficult at best, and it really can only be experienced--a gestalt sensation like much of what Polanyi describes. So allow me one final direction for the novice reading.

Do not skip the preface; read it slowly; write a paragraph about what it means to you and proceed with the rest of the book. Then, when you have finished going through every narrative, every dead-end, and every digression, go back to the preface. Read it again slowly and appreciate your new context. In hindsight, the first reading will feel shallow and small, even if it felt fine at the time. Acknowledge how the words are all the same as before, yet they all have new functions and new meanings with a new background. The second preface reading will have all the colours and currents of the deep river in which you submerged yourself for four hundred pages. We may call the shift of colour our second simplicity.
70 people found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United States on December 15, 2016
Periodically I return to this great book, not only to squeeze every last drop of wisdom from it, but also to simply enjoy its prose. Organizationally, the book is discursive, yet coherent.

THE COHERENT WHOLE:
The plan of the book is four-fold.

(1) We notice that even in the most objective sciences, we have to make subjective judgements. The situation relies even more on our subjective selves the less formalized a discipline becomes.

(2) This observation spurs a long meditation on how our objective standards and subjective skills go together. The melding of the two, of the subjective and objective, is what Polanyi calls Personal Knowledge.

(3) This meditation allows us to attack the question, How can we be confident in our knowledge, seeing that it relies on our finite and error prone selves? The answer is, strangely perhaps, that though our judgements might be erroneous, we nevertheless feel compelled to make personal commitments to making our worlds of experience more satisfactory.

(4) Our conclusion opens up a view of all of life, where each creature uses its tacit skill to achieve unprecedented forms of understanding. The discarded view is the idea that life's creative outburst is the result of mechanistic, formal processes. The new view is that life's lifeblood is a organic gestalt, where parts contribute to wholes in unprecedented and non predictable ways.

THE DISCURSIVE SIDE:

Outside of this main plan, yet contributing to it, we travel over a huge range of territory. Physics, mathematics, psychology, biology, politics, history, religion, philosophy are all called into play. Along the way, we critique Marxism, scientism, mechanism, anti-traditionalism, over-traditionism, rationalism and more. It's quite an adventure. In it all, Polanyi says, "look and see how it all goes together." And it does.

APPRAISAL:

History and tradition might, and I think should, look upon Polanyi's work favorably. It is a very well argued work. His discursive range is vast, and for dilettantes, a smorgasbord of delight. And large portions of it are incontestably true (very rare for philosophy). A blemish appears to me Polanyi's realism. It seems Polanyi is unsure that we ever actually make contact with the real world, though we must nevertheless accept naively the appearances we're given. It would have been better if he had been aware of or argued for an Idealist conception of reality, where what is given in experience is actually the world. In this case, a gnawing sense of unreality about our knowing acts, would have transfigured into a joyful contact with actuality. But this means, at least, Idealists can appropriate his thoughts and feel their full vigor.
15 people found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United States on April 25, 2018
Among the thousands of mind blowing connections on each page, a central tone of humble self skepticism pervades the text and gives it a richness uncommon in difficult special-language philosophy texts. Recursively, this comes from a central premise of Polanyi himself, that Every jump from evidence to interpretation to explanation brings in countless beliefs and biases, a point made by Mary Joe Nye in the preface.

On that topic, the preface itself is worth the price of the entire book! It very clearly outlines not just Polanyi's central premises, but Polanyi the person. BUT it must me studied, not read. In Polanyi's own terms, knowledge requires commitment, which implies bias, and profiting from this volume takes a LOT of effort due to the stylistic and special linguistic significance of many terms, which are not used in their ordinary sense.

Of course you could say that about all philosophy of science texts, but this book is unique in that it doesn't "start and end with words" like a lot of texts that seem to just be an ego outing by the author to dance with semantics, but actually helps the reader look at her life through different lenses, frames, focuses and zooms as we examine the practical assumptions we make when jumping from evidence to explanation. Highly recommended, but not for the faint of heart or time constrained soul!
28 people found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United States on July 31, 2015
Polanyi, well qualified to express an opinion, claims that confidence in the objective truth is no better than worshiping a god as a means to achieve personal liberty. I cannot imagine anyone making a better case for his opinion, and I respect the opinion for him. However, I prefer for me my faith in the objective truth of which much is undiscovered and some is understood.
One person found this helpful
Report

Top reviews from other countries

Translate all reviews to English
Fergus J. King
5.0 out of 5 stars Thematic?
Reviewed in Australia on May 12, 2019
A fascinating book which helps to develop one's thinknig about epistemology and heuristic method
Toyama0811
5.0 out of 5 stars 文句なしの良書
Reviewed in Japan on November 18, 2013
21世紀に生かされる建設的な提言力、個性を踏まえた普遍知への誘導、この本は100年の耐久力があると信じる。
3 people found this helpful
Report
Dr. C. Jeynes
5.0 out of 5 stars The slipperiness of facts
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on September 15, 2008
This book was first published in 1958, and if anything it is more relevant today. It is a long, subtle and detailed book, one you cannot rush, just like a fine old wine. Polanyi was a distinguished physical chemist, and a Fellow of the Royal Society, and this work was his extended and articulate rebuttal of the positivist account of science that was prevalent then and is growing again now.

Many (most) people today have only a very hazy idea of what proper scientific method is, and what characterises good science practise. Polanyi shows that far from being all cut and dried as popular mythology would have it, the progress of science depends to a much greater extent than commonly recognised on what he calls "tacit knowledge": the hunch, the smell of a problem, a sense of how it ought to be.

If you want to know how science really works, from a master of the art, and you like engaging in profound thought, then this book is for you.
15 people found this helpful
Report
Claude Carranza
5.0 out of 5 stars A great book, a beautiful book
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on May 1, 2012
I just quoted Mr. Raymond Aron's opinion on this book: "Un grand livre, un beau livre"

Yes, by the greatest french intellectual of the 20th century, speaking about the hungarian-british scientist turned philosopher.

Don't lose time reading Sartre, Hegel, Kant, whatever. The esssentials are in this book: real philosophy about real things, only useful abstractions, deep and also vibrant.

This gem has been "hiding", so to speak, since the 1950s. Yes, only a small minority has enjoyed it for over half a century.

You can for around 10 pounds ... And hey, beware: I DO NOT WORK FOR AMAZON, IN SPITE OF APPEARANCES !!!!!!!!!

This is my own personal bible, that's all.
4 people found this helpful
Report
AV
5.0 out of 5 stars In Depth Reading
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on September 25, 2017
A very interesting book - needs time to absorb.

Good service form this seller, would use them again.